12/19/2023 0 Comments Lspdfr ultimate backup interferingRollbacks can easily be reverted, including rolling back the rollback. Autopatrol/confirmed/etc (including rollback) can be easily removed. Examples for such requests that should be considered more in depth would include server access, stewardship, crat, and Oversight/ CheckUser. IMHO the only reason rights shouldn't be granted is if there is a reason to believe that they will be misused, the request for rights is made in bad faith, or there is a security/privacy reason to deny the request. In my own opinion, and not representing any policy or view of Miraheze staff, I think that if something needs to be done, it should be done by anyone able to, and as many people should be able to as possible. Comment: I'm actually thinking of writing an essay on the subject matter.If there will be vandalism you will probably be assigned. The user is active and helps a lot at Miraheze but there is no need for rollback as we've only had 2 vandals on Meta since the creation of Miraheze. Comment: Not against the user having permissions, in fact I support the user themselves, but I'm not sure how much these rights are needed as Meta isn't very active and there's already more than 5 sysops.I simply Request Rollback permissions permissions on the wiki, as It is a quite basic Permission that might be required in some specific situations and That is only one Administrator active, It would be likely to help him in such a basic thing, And let him do the Real job he needs to do. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Support (I didn't even support it myself) As I don't think we should have inactive sysops on meta. I haven't seen this on wiki, don't know them well, and will not be performing a check). (This is also assuming the two are the same user. QuimGil and Icaria36: to see if either replies. SleepyMode 18:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Comment: Neither really appears active on Meta. Reception123 (talk)( contribs) 05:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Ĭomments Support The user is Inactive and shouldn't stay with Administrator permissions. Therefore, I propose that either his rights are removed or they are switched to his other account used more often, Icaria36. I think that it's not a good idea to have inactive administrators on Meta. I have noticed that User:QuimGil is an administrator but has no edits globally or on meta. Removal or Switiching of Administrator rights for User:QuimGil Not done As there are not enough votes to determine if the rights should be removed or not. I outfitted them with EUP gear, in pair with LSPDFR EUP Configurations for anyone who uses eup's outfit configs.The following discussion is closed. If you want to force them to wear what you want them to wear, then its possibly, but I don't know what you want. I don't understand what you mean? EUP outfits use the mp_freemode peds, which is many variations, and these xml's (which is the only thing you downloaded) configure ultimate backup with eup's outfit configurations. I'll probably use your lines anyways and edit them a bit! It is how ever great to have these pre made for people who doesn't really know how to or have time to set up custom outfits for their backup units, so GG for that. Guess I'm getting older with my confusion here. Would be sweet to figure out a way to force vanilla eup ai cops to use what you want, which I thought this was for. It doesn't right, it's just premade codes to add to defaultregions.xml so backup units through Ultimate Backup will use what you want them to use right? I thought this made vanilla eup cops use what you wanted. I got a bit curious seeing this, but now I feel disappointed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |